Seeking recognition through carceral health care bureaucracy: Analysis of medical care request forms in a County Jail.

People experiencing incarceration in the U.S. have a constitutional right to have access to health care. Yet actualizing this right is constrained by the everyday reality of an environment designed to punish and limit autonomy. The principal means for accessing health care in a carceral facility is for an individual to submit a written request, which then gets handled through the jail's bureaucratic processes. In this paper, we provide quantitative and qualitative analyses of the content and circulation of one month of these written requests-called "medical care request" (MCR) forms-at an urban, U.S. jail to understand the meanings of health and health care for a group of individuals who are systematically marginalized. In one month in 2012 at this jail housing 140 individuals, 527 MCRs were submitted. We coded requests into categories: medications, amelioration of living conditions, specific symptoms, and requests for a specific health care service. The most common request was for pain medication. In qualitative analysis, four key themes emerged: reliance on the clinic to mediate the needs of daily life; deservingness of health care; hyperawareness of bodily and psychic discomfort; and temporal techniques for asserting control over individuals' time and bodies in jail. We show that MCRs are a key mechanism through which incarcerated individuals seek recognition of their physical and psychic suffering, and more broadly, of their very existences. When considered in the broader context of controlling carceral regimes and health inequities that characterize U.S. society, MCRs become dynamic terrain through which jail health care providers and incarcerated people negotiate the tensions of deservingness of care.

Studying Accompaniment model Feasibility and Effectiveness (SAFE) Study: study protocol for a prospective observational cohort study of the effectiveness of self-managed medication abortion.

INTRODUCTION: A range of barriers deter or prevent people from accessing facility-based abortion care. As a result, people are obtaining and using abortifacient medications to end their pregnancies outside of the formal healthcare system, without clinical supervision. One model of self-managed abortion has come to be known as the 'accompaniment' model, in which grassroots organisations provide pregnant people with evidence-based counselling and support through the medication abortion process. Data are needed to understand the safety and effectiveness of this increasingly common model of abortion care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a large, prospective, observational study in Argentina and Nigeria. All people who contact one of two accompaniment groups seeking information for their own self-managed medication abortion, are ages 13 years and older, have no contraindications for medication abortion, are within the gestational range supported by the group (up to 12 weeks' gestation for the primary outcome) and are willing to be contacted for follow-up will be recruited. Participants will respond to an interviewer-administered baseline survey at enrolment, and 1-4 additional surveys over 6 weeks to ascertain whether they obtain medications for abortion, dosing and route of administration of medications, physical and emotional experience of medication abortion self-management, and effectiveness and safety outcomes. Analyses will include estimates of the primary outcome: the proportion of participants that report a complete abortion without surgical intervention at last recorded follow-up; as well as secondary outcomes including a pseudo-experimental test of non-inferiority of the effectiveness of self-managed medication abortion as compared with clinical medication abortion. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We describe the ethical considerations and protections for this study, as well the creation of a study-specific Data Monitoring and Oversight Committee. We describe dissemination plans to ensure that study results are shared widely with all relevant audiences, particularly researchers, advocates, policymakers and clinicians. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN95769543.

Integration of Onsite Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Services Into School-Based Health Centers.

BACKGROUND: With recent recommendations from professional organizations, long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) methods are considered appropriate first-line contraception for adolescents. Many school-based health centers (SBHCs) in New York City (NYC) have recently added onsite LARC insertion and management to their contraceptive options. We aimed to explore key elements needed to implement LARC training and services into the SBHC setting and to identify successful factors for program implementation. METHODS: Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with 19 providers and staff at 7 SBHCs in high schools in the Bronx and analyzed using Dedoose. RESULTS: Support and leadership from administration; comprehensive onsite training of providers and staff; developing an effective staffing model for procedure sessions; and patient-centered contraceptive counseling were 4 key themes named by respondents as crucial to the program implementation process. CONCLUSIONS: Integrating LARC services onsite at SBHCs is feasible and positively received by providers and staff. With good leadership, staffing, training, and appropriate contraceptive counseling, both SBHCs and other primary clinics that serve adolescents can integrate LARC insertion, removal, and management into routine contraceptive care. This in turn can increase youth access to these methods.

"Everything I Needed from Her Was Everything She Gave Back to Me:" An Evaluation of Preconception Counseling for U.S. HIV-serodiscordant Couples Desiring Pregnancy.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate preconception counseling (PCC) through a qualitative examination of the experiences of couples with serodiscordant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status desiring pregnancy. METHODS: Patients involved in HIV-serodiscordant relationships who received PCC between January 2013 and January 2015 were recruited to participate in 40-minute semistructured telephone interviews. Participants were asked about their experiences with PCC and the impact of counseling on their knowledge of safer conception strategies and reproductive decisions. Two researchers independently coded interview transcripts, and delineated common ideas to generate emerging themes from participants' responses. RESULTS: Eleven respondents completed the interviews, including nine women and two men. Six respondents were HIV positive. Our thematic analysis revealed that patients gained knowledge and confidence through PCC that conception was both possible and safe. They had varied reactions to assisted reproductive technologies that correlated with income level, and explored complicated weighing of personal risk of HIV transmission. Patients reported major challenges including poor access to PCC, difficulty identifying peak fertility periods, and lack of long-term conception follow-up. DISCUSSION: PCC is a valuable resource for patients involved in HIV-serodiscordant relationships. We recommend the following opportunities for improvement: developing practical safer conception clinical and counseling guidelines for HIV-affected couples, increasing patient access to and awareness of PCC services, distributing more helpful resources to identify peak fertility, and providing long-term support for patients.